Friday, June 10, 2005

Our Own Gullibility

In his book entitled Comes the Millennium, Jack Blake states, “the grand American experiment in individual freedom is in imminent danger from within, and the enemy is our own gullibility.” But Mr. Blake’s book is about his view that American intolerance and the political aggression of fundamentalist Christians is the principal threat to the ideals of our founding fathers and threatens to transform America into a totalitarian regime. I disagree with Blake. It is true that Americans are in danger from within, and that the enemy is our own gullibility, but the threat to America does not come from fundamentalist Christians, it comes from the Wahhabism that has been introduced, paid for, distributed, and reinforced by our “good friends,” the Saudis. In fact, we might also conclude that Wahhabism is directly responsible for every single act of Islamic terrorism since the end of World War II.

In a study conducted by the Center for Religious Freedom, entitled Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques, it becomes clear that America has become the target of Islamic violence. In a foreword by former Director of Central Intelligence, R. James Woolsey states:

“A major part of the reason for this and other important changes in the Kingdom was the Saudi royal family’s reaction to the tumultuous year of 1979 [Khomeini’s Rise to Power—ed]. We are still feeling the after-shocks today. The Saudis chose after the twin shocks of that year to strike a Faustian bargain with the Wahhabi sect and not only to accommodate their views about propriety, pious behavior, and Islamic law, but effectively to turn over education in the Kingdom to them and later to fund the expansion into Pakistan and elsewhere of their extreme, hostile, anti-modern, and anti-infidel form of Islam. The other side of the bargain was that if the Wahhabis would concentrate their attacks on, essentially, the U.S. and Israel, the Saudi elite would get a more-or-less free ride from the Wahhabis and the corruption within the Kingdom would be overlooked.”

Woolsey continues:

“Today in the Kingdom . . . young people are systematically infused with hostility for 'infidels.' Moreover, most young Saudis are not equipped when they graduate from school to perform the jobs necessary to operate a modern economy. Instead many are employed, if that is the right word, as, e.g., religious police – walking the streets to harass women whose veils may not fully cover their faces, for example. Young Saudis’ anger based on their lack of useful work and their indoctrination is palpable. It is not an accident that 15 of the 19 terrorists who attacked us on September 11 were Saudis. The New York Times (January 27, 2002) cited a poll conducted by Saudi Intelligence, and shared with the U.S. government, that over 95% of Saudis between the ages of 25 and 41 have sympathy for Osama bin Laden.”

Now, much has been written about the concerns of many (surely, not most) Americans about the thousands of Muslims who live among us. It may be fair to say that we are not being provided with the truth about what is happening within our own communities. For example, we have seen instances where Islamic leaders stand before a podium and renounce extremist views and publicly align themselves with the so-called “war on terror,” but should we believe it? Is it possible to think that most Muslims living in America stand solidly with the rest of us in adoration of the “land of the Free?” Perhaps not; a recently scheduled Muslim demonstration against terror fizzled.

But Mr. Woolsey continues:

“The Saudi-funded, Wahhabi-operated export of hatred for us reaches around the globe. It is well known that the religious schools of Pakistan that educated a large share of the Taliban and al Qaeda are Wahhabi. But Pakistan is not the sole target. I had in my office recently a moderate Muslim leader from an Asian country. He was in the U.S., seeking to obtain funds from foundations, so that he could have printed elementary school textbooks to compete with the Wahhabi-funded textbooks that are flooding his country and that are being made available to schools at little or no cost.

“The Wahhabi textbooks in his country, like textbooks in Saudi Arabia, teach that it is the obligation of all Muslims to consider all infidels the enemy. As an illustration of the consequences of such teaching, I have heard that in some cases during the fighting in Bosnia in the early nineties, American churches and synagogues that were raising funds for food and other aid for the Bosnian Muslims would approach local mosques and suggest a cooperative effort. On a number of occasions they were turned down and didn’t understand why. The reason was that for a Wahhabi Imam (and Sheikh Kabbani, perhaps the U.S.’s leading moderate Muslim leader, says that a substantial percentage of American mosques have Wahhabi-funded Imams), it is normally not believed to be permissible for Muslims to work with infidels, even if the purpose is to help Muslims.”


Reaching into America is the goal of the Wahabbists. They are capable, as we have seen, to do great harm to the American people, our guests, our institutions, and the economy, but there is no possibility that Jihadists can destroy America from an outward invasion. But these people do realize that American is within their grasp through subterfuge, and they are doing it almost in plain sight of us all, if only we would open our eyes to the truth.

Mr. Woolsey correctly points out that:

"Americans are not normally comfortable distinguishing between what is acceptable and what is not acceptable within a religion, unless they are, say, debating views within their own church. Because of the First Amendment and American culture, most Americans tend not to make judgments about others’ religions. But the Wahhabis and the Islamists whom they work with and support have a long political reach and their views have substantial political effect. Some of the consequences of this 'grotesque protection racket' have been quite lethal: American deaths and the failure to apprehend the terrorists who killed them."


Finally, this warning by the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency:

"Wahhabi and Islamist extremism today is the soil in which al Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are growing. We need to recognize the problem posed by the international spread of this hate ideology, including within the American homeland."


Okay, so what? For one thing, any American who believes that Islam is a peaceful, forgiving religion has lost touch with reality. Despite what the Koran says about Jews and Christians (people of the book), Muslim actions are speaking much louder than Koranic words, and in several important areas. Perhaps it is true that we are being over-inundated with information concerning terrorists; maybe most of us have tuned it out because it is disturbing and we’d much rather focus on our private, materialistic goals. Some might argue that this is just another example of the right-wing conspiracy to frighten people away from the democratic platform.

So let’s just take a quick look at what these “textbooks” are telling Muslims who are living in America; what to do, how to behave, and how to “embrace” America. Quoting now from the study conducted by the Center for Religious Freedom:

“On December 3, 2004, Ahmed, an Arab exchange student, walks down a palm lined boulevard in a working class neighborhood of Los Angeles. Since it is Friday, he bypasses the Hispanic restaurants, the 7/11, and the sporting goods store, and enters the King Fahd mosque – an elegant building of white marble etched with gold, adorned by a blue minaret, that is named after its benefactor, the King of Saudi Arabia. Later he will join 500 other California Muslims in prayer but, because it is early, he visits the mosque library where he picks up several books on religious guidance, written in Arabic, that are offered free to Muslims like him, newly arrived and uncertain on how to fit into this modern, diverse land.

"The tracts he opens are in the voice of a senior religious authority. They tell him that America, his adoptive home, is the 'Abode of the Infidel,' the Christian and the Jew. He reads: 'Be dissociated from the infidels, hate them for their religion, leave them, never rely on them for support, do not admire them, and always oppose them in every way according to Islamic law.'

"The advice is emphatic: 'There is consensus on this matter, that whoever helps Unbelievers against Muslims, regardless of what type of support he lends to them, he is an unbeliever himself.'

"The books give him detailed instructions on how to build a 'wall of resentment' between himself and the infidel: 'Never greet the Christian or Jew first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday Never befriend an infidel unless it is to convert him. Never imitate the infidel Never work for an infidel. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel.'

"Ahmed looks carefully at the book’s cover. It says 'Greetings from the Cultural Department' of the Embassy of Saudi Arabia in Washington, D.C. The book is published by the government of Saudi Arabia. The other books are textbooks from the Saudi Education Ministry, and collections of fatwas, religious edicts, issued by the government’s religious office, published by other organizations based in Riyadh."

Such hate-filled materials are not limited to distribution at mosques. In Alexandria, Virginia, a few scant miles from our nation’s capital, sits the Islamic Saudi Academy, a private school providing education for K through Grade 12. This school was established in 1984 and is owned and operated by the nation of Saudi Arabia, a bastion of Wahhabism. Quoting terrorism expert Daniel Pipes:

“[A]n outpost of Saudi values on American soil, the academy enjoys Saudi government funding, is chaired by the Saudi ambassador in Washington, and boasts a curriculum imported straight from Riyadh.” According to a February 25, 2002, front-page story, the Islamic Saudi Academy teaches students, among other things, that “the Day of Judgment cannot come until Jesus Christ returns to Earth, breaks the cross and converts everyone to Islam, and until Muslims start attacking Jews.”

Furthermore, global maps hanging in classrooms are missing Israel.

ISA recently made national news in February 2005, when 1999 valedictorian Ahmed Abu Ali was arrested on federal charges, including planning to assassinate President Bush and trying to establish an Al-Qaeda cell in the United States. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) has repeatedly called for an investigation into the operations of ISA. There are three other similar schools in the Washington, D.C. area: the Muslim Community School in Potomac, Maryland; the Institute for Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America in Fairfax, Virginia; and the Graduate School of Islamic Social Sciences of Ashburn, Virginia. According to Dr. Anis Shorrosh, a member of the Oxford Society of Scholars and a Palestinian Christian Arab American who is fluent in both Arabic and English, there are 300 exclusively Muslim schools in the United States. Furthermore, Susan Douglass, national curriculum advisor for social-science texts, formerly taught at ISA and is married to a Muslim who teaches at the Muslim Community School of Potomac, Maryland; she has influence on the material presented to children attending our nation’s public school system.

The following quotation from Dawanet, a Muslim website, explains how thoroughly the public-relations campaign to Islamify our culture has invaded our educational system:

Dawa means to invite non-Muslims to accept the truth of Islam. Performing Dawa involves both our words and actions….Students are routinely exposed in their classroom to new information and opinions, hence they tend to be more receptive to new beliefs and ideas. Schools are therefore fertile grounds where the seeds of Islam can be sowed inside the hearts of non-Muslim students. Muslim students should take ample advantage of this opportunity and present to their schoolmates the beautiful beliefs of Islam….We should use every opportunity to sensitize non-Muslim peers and school staff to Islam and to establish an environment in which everywhere a non-Muslim turns, he notices Islam portrayed in a positive way, is influenced by it and eventually accepts Islam…”


According to Dr. Shorrosh, author of Islam Revealed, Americans are sleeping through an invasion. He believes that the United States is under systematic attack from within and cites the following as danger signals: hate-crime bills are terminating freedom of speech, dialogues in the media and in institutions of learning are proclaiming the virtues of Islam and propagandizing that Islam is similar to Judeo-Christianity, Muslim sympathizers are serving in political office, Muslims are buying up stock in various public media, Muslim funding is establishing Centers for Islamic Studies at our universities, various organizations are appealing to Americans for sympathy and tolerance toward immigrants from oppressed Muslim countries, and numerous charities are serving as money-launderers for terrorist organizations.

One of the leaders in the public-relations campaign is CAIR, which was established in 1984 under the banner of “Establishing Trust, Building Partnerships.” Just recently, this organization completed its library project, whereby pro-Islam materials have been donated to every library system in the United States; Saudi Arabia contributed substantially to the funding of this project, and, as a result, the materials are particularly adept at whitewashing information about Wahhabism. Not only have the materials been placed, but also Muslims are encouraged to check out the material on a regular basis so as to keep the books and videos in circulation and thus out of the book sales which larger systems use to make room on their shelves. In addition, CAIR is presently running a Quran-distribution program. This newest public-relations strategy is making available an English translation which promotes hatred toward the infidels. The translation was so objectionable that even the Los Angeles Public School System removed it from their shelves.

Furthermore, CAIR is not the innocuous civil-rights organization it purports to be. The organization’s connections to terrorism run deeply, in spite of CAIR’s denials. For example, in October 1998, CAIR demanded the removal of a Los Angeles billboard which criticized Osama bin Laden because the depiction was “offensive to Muslims.” CAIR has also defended other militant Islamists, including Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind sheikh who planned to plant bombs at various New York City landmarks; in addition CAIR proclaimed the conviction of the perpetrators of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing as “a travesty of justice.” CAIR protests nearly every arrest of a suspected terrorist, usually on the grounds of profiling. This past weekend, for the second time in a month, CAIR held events at the Sheraton Premiere Hotel, located in Vienna, Virginia. The second event was a fundraising banquet, and, attending the meeting, were the parents of aspiring Presidential assassin Ahmed Abu Ali and Senator John Warner of Virginia. Just a few days ago, Florida Governor Jeb Bush sent CAIR a letter commending the organization for its “contributions to the protection of civil rights and freedom of religion.” All this pandering to CAIR in spite of the warning from Steven Pomerantz, the FBI’s former chief of counterterrorism:

“CAIR, its leaders and its activities effectively give aid to international terrorist groups.”


What should we conclude? First, we should think that former Central Intelligence Director Woolsey knows what he’s talking about when he says,

“Wahhabi and Islamist extremism today is the soil in which al Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are growing. We need to recognize the problem posed by the international spread of this hate ideology, including within the American homeland.”


I suspect that the U. S. Constitution protects free speech for Muslims, just as it does for everyone else. But are textbooks prepared by a foreign government, which incite discord within American borders, also protected? Muslims have the right to express themselves, but does our Constitution protect the King of Saudi Arabia when he or his government provokes a wall of resentment? Encouraging Muslims to hate their American hosts, along with Jews, would seem to present a clear and present danger to the safety and security of the American people, so I think there is cause to wonder how our government intends to safeguard us when the enemy is already here.

Terrorists are urged to “use” American law against Americans who may want to prosecute them by encouraging them to make claims of duress and abusive treatment, and instructing them insist on their constitutional rights. Extremists are taught how to take advantage of free legal representation. All of this suggests to me a conspiracy against American democracy and its people by the people who petitioned us for permission to live here.

Any American who sees “Reds” under his bed may be a fool. On the other hand, any American who fails to see the danger of Wahabbism when it is standing directly in front of him is irrationally, dangerously, and potentially terminally gullible. The threat is real, and unless or until Americans become aware of this danger, and begin to insist that their elected officials acknowledge this menace as well, they are unwisely subjecting themselves, and their families to horrific consequences.

Jointly authored by Always On Watch and Social Sense.

10 Comments:

At 6/10/2005 11:41 AM, Blogger The MaryHunter said...

Man oh man, this whole thing just scares the bejesus out of me. Trying desparately to not be xenophobic or islamophobic here, but also feel like I'm swimming upstream. Excellent work.

 
At 6/10/2005 3:37 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

The tentacles of the militant ideology of Islam run deep in our society. I know exactly what you mean when you say that you "feel like I'm swimming upstream."

More people need to understand what's afoot in our land. As the old saying goes, "Forewarned is forearmed." Remember how alert we all were after 9/11? We need to reestablish that mindset and not be lulled into danger.

 
At 6/11/2005 11:55 AM, Anonymous Hotel Bravo said...

I fear that most people who read this important message will do exactly what the Muslim community is banking on: nothing. Readers will continue to go about their business as usual, focusing more on their own daily activities and caring little about what transpires in their own communities.

The incident in Lodi, CA is not detached from what it going on all across America, and yet it won't be until some idiot walks in to a supermarket and starts shooting people randomly that maybe -- just maybe the light will come on. But then, people in other locations will just look at the incident as something that happened to other people, never realizing that they too could one day be "other people."

And law enforcement will investigate the crime(s) as but another example of "criminals gone wild," and news media will put the incident to bed as soon as possible.

We are at WAR, my fellow Americans. It is a war like we've never before experienced; God help us if we do not come to this realization sooner, rather than later.

 
At 6/12/2005 3:13 AM, Blogger M. Simon said...

Americans are well armed. That is a comfort.

BTW the answer to bad speech is more speech.

Exposure is the way to go.

Make them answer in public.

Get the word out.

Americans are neither stupid nor ignorant. Bush won.

 
At 6/12/2005 6:07 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Hotel Bravo,
Yes, many people are choosing to believe that "this too shall pass." American optimism? And, as you pointed out, the mainstream media are lulling us into a false sense of security.

But since I discovered the blogosphere this past March, I've learned that many are aware of the truth.

 
At 6/12/2005 6:22 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Hotel Bravo,
One more thing...A day or two after the publicizing of the Lodi arrests, I heard a CNN commentator say something very like the following: "Isn't the timing of this interesting? Just when the Patriot Act is coming up for renewal." The desk anchors agreed, thus putting out the speculative idea that the Lodi arrests could be a 'put-up deal.' Pretty quickly, these fools went on to another story--how the FBI missed the clues for 9/11. I wonder how many viewers noticed that inconsistency.

BTW, Fox News gave saturation coverage to the Lodi arrrests, and MSNBC did a decent job, probably because they talk with Dr. Walid Phares, who has been warning of "the second wave of al-Qaeda," particularly as that concept relates to the Florida arrests. Local-news channels, with the exception of Fox, gave the Lodi story some coverage, but not enough.

 
At 6/12/2005 6:35 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

You make a good point when you say "Americans are neither stupid nor ignorant. Bush won." However, I am concerned that the Bush administration continues to stroke Saudi Arabia, the home of Wahhabism, which is incompatible with American principles. And I've lately become suspicious of Grover Norquist. See
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/451:
"Paul Sperry, author of the new book, Infiltration, in an interview calls Grover Norquist 'an agent of influence for Islamists in Washington.' When asked by FrontPageMag.com why a Republican anti-tax lobbyist should so passionately promote Islamist causes, Sperry implied that Norquist has converted to Islam: 'He's marrying a Muslim, and when I asked Norquist if he himself has converted to Islam, he brushed the question off as too "personal." As Lawrence Auster comments on this exchange, 'Clearly, if Norquist hadn't converted to Islam, or weren't in the process of doing so, he would simply have answered no.'
"Indeed, Norquist married Samah Alrayyes, a Palestinian Muslim, on April 2, 2005, and Islamic law limits a Muslim woman to marrying a man who is Muslim. This is not an abstract dictum but a very serious imperative, with many 'honor' killings having resulted from a woman ignoring her family's wishes.
"Alrayyes has radical Islamic credentials of her own...Norquist has for some years now been promoting Islamist organizations, including even the Council on American-Islamic Relations...Norquist is enabling 'a political influence operation to advance the causes of radical Islamists, and targeted most particularly at the Bush Administration.'"

There are links to explore in the above article.

 
At 6/12/2005 12:00 PM, Blogger GNN Staff Writer said...

Thanks for the comment and links. I had to blogroll you.

Keep up the good work.

 
At 6/16/2005 7:20 PM, Anonymous cubed said...

Well said--all of it!

We are beyond gullible--we have been "set up" since the mid-1800s by a school system that was designed by Horace Mann specifically to teach all children a single philosophy. He hoped that by so doing, he would create a stable, predictable society in the manner of his Calvinist Massachusetts Bay Colony ancestors.

For reasons too long to go into here, it had precisely the opposite effect. But the system itself, a tax-supported compulsory system modeled after the one established by Martin Luther early in the Reformation, was seen as a gold mine by the rapidly growing utopian socialist movement of the time.

At the turn of the last century, they began their work in earnest to create a socialist society. The children were seen as a particularly valuable asset, so they worked hard--and successfully--to guide and ultimately control the direction taken by American education. By the 1950s, a "critical mass" had been reached, and by the 1960s, the effects were highly visible.

Part I of the process was the "dumbing down" effect; first, deprive children of knowledge, of facts. Without knowledge, there's nothing to think about. Part II was to substitute socialist values for knowledge.

A big chunk of Part II was the elimination of the Enlightenment thinking that led to the design and founding of the United States, and the substitution for it of Postmodernist ("postmodernist" refers to the kind of thinking that came after, and opposed, the thinking of the Enlightenment period) nihilist ("nihilism" is a negative, deconstructivist philosophy) suported by the "Three Stooges" of philosophy--Kant, Hegel, and Marx.

Again, it's too long to go into here, but most people recognize Marx and his association with the Soviet Union, Communist China, etc.

Suffice it to say that our own Left--a "subculture" of postmodernist nihilists--succeeded in gaining control of the government school system. A big part of what they taught as a substitute for thinking was what was to become known as "political correctness," "multiculturalism," "diversity," "moral equivalence," and so on.

Islam has ridden into the classrooms of America on the coat tails of PC, multiculturalism, diversity, and moral equivalence.

Since Islam is a fused system--the state and the religion are seamlessly fused, with the Koran as the source of law--the lessons about Islam are also lessons about religion. You can't have one without the other. The lesson plans are often designed by Muslim organizations, and taught in the classrooms by Muslim "mentors." It is by this means that Islam is able to skirt the Constitutional prohibition of having an agency of the government (the schools) promoting and teaching a religion.

Since Muslims are the authors of many of the the lesson plans, and often advisors to textbook publishers as well, it is easy to see why it is that Islam receives such a sympathetic--some would even say "whitewash"--treatment in our schools.

Since the basic "mindset" of most children is well established by the time of the final brain organization that occurs at puberty, and that this mindset is difficult to change after that, it behooves us to examine with great care what it is we teach, and the effect it has on us.

We are currently committing suicide.

 
At 6/17/2005 7:34 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Cubed,
Thank you for your comprehensive analysis of the "takeover" of our public school system. You've taken me back in time to the days when I took my teacher training (1968-1972). I recall being horrified at the material presented in my foundations and methods classes as I witnessed future colleagues being trained to dumb down the curriculum. I challenged a few of my professors and nearly lost the opportunity to obtain my credentials. After a few years in the public system, I left--never to return.

Now my brainwashed generation is adminstrating the schools and training our future teachers. Even worse, as you pointed out, Muslims are controlling much of the material presented, and the presentation is obviously biased. Is anything being done to address that problem? Not much, although recently the Hindus in Fairfax County, Virginia, managed to get some alterations done. The problem is that we are rapidly running out of teachers who know the truth and are able to present it effectively.

Yes, Postmodernist nihilism is now running the show, and getting to this point is a result of incremental steps, all in the direction opposite to the American system. As you said, "We are currently committing suicide."

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home