Tuesday, February 07, 2006

How Far Along Are We?

Maybe it's time to revisit some December 2002 material from Dr. Anis Shorrosh. The following is reproduced in its entirety:

TWENTY-YEAR PLAN FOR USA
ISLAM TARGETS AMERICA


1. Terminate America’s freedom of speech by replacing it with hate crime bills state-wide and nation-wide.

2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities to promote Islam as the original African-American’s religion while Christianity is for the whites! Strange enough, no one tells the African-Americans that it was the Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves, neither the fact that in Arabic the word for black and slave is the same, “Abed.”

3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.

4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office for favorable legislation to Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.

5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the internet by buying the corporations or a controlling stock.

6. Yield to the fear of imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America – the black gold. America’s economy depends on oil, (1000 products are derived from oil), so does its personal and industrial transportation and manufacturing -41% comes from the Middle East.

7. Yell, “foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un-American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran” anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.

8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions, get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way. Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?

9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:
a. Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961)
b. No birth control whatsoever – every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.
c. Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one cannot have the Muslim legal permission to marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.
d. Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2000 released inmates have joined Al Qaida world-wide). Only a few have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil. So far – sleeping cells!

10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are 300 exclusively Muslim schools with loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution.

11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish “Centers for Islamic studies” with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher education institutions.

12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have high-jacked Islam, not the truth, which is Islam high-jacked the terrorists. Furthermore in January of 2002, Saudi Arabia’s Embassy in Washington mailed 4500 packets of the Quran, videos, promoting Islam to America’s high schools--free. They would never allow us to reciprocate.

13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards the Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.

14. Nullify America’s sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. (We have experienced this too often since 9-11.)

15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not American’s justice system.

16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S. but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.

17. Raise interest in Islam on America’s campuses by insisting that freshman take at least one course on Islam. Be sure that the writer is a bonafide American, Christian, scholarly and able to cover up the violence in the Quran and express the peaceful, spiritual and religious aspect only.

18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media of their visibility.

19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.

20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the US by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.
Dr. Shorrosh, D.Min, D.Phil, is the author of Islam Revealed, a bestseller which has been printed eight times. According to the book review at Amazon, "Dr. Anis Shorrosh explains the driving force behind the fanatical, as well as the moderate and conservative sects of Islam."

43 Comments:

At 2/07/2006 9:20 PM, Blogger beakerkin said...

Great post

However mostly Roman Cathlic Latinos, Chinese and Hindu Immigrants will out number Muslims by several multiples.

Black clergy will not roll over. Moreover the hate crime index shows blacks have a high rate of perpetrating anti Muslim hate crimes.

However the rest of the post is stellar.

 
At 2/07/2006 9:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A grim and timely reminder of Muslim plans for domination.

I wonder how the Muslims will cope with Chinese desire for hegemony in the world? The Chinese would walk all over them in terms of know-how and business acumen. And they ( the Chinese) certainly would want no part of what they would consider to be a primitive tribal belief.

 
At 2/07/2006 10:23 PM, Blogger Jason Pappas said...

We've lost ground on almost every item on the list. It's not that we've seen any of those items completed but they've made a dent on each front.

It was time for a report card ... and review of those points.

BTW, I've written our leaders in Washington again telling them they've taken the wrong side by expressing sympathy for the Islamic critics of the Danish press. I've used phrases like "aiding and abetting" and emboldening those who use violence. I don’t expect much but I want them on notice that many of us are furious. Besides, it takes only 1% of Americans to match all the CAIR supporters (or SCAIR as Pim would put it). I think I'll send the same letters tomorrow ... they don't remember who wrote.

 
At 2/07/2006 10:54 PM, Blogger Dan Zaremba said...

"..flaunt world opinion by murdering as many islamics as they could find.."

Of course they are capable of doing it but for now they also sponsor the Islamist movements.
Make no mistake where the mujahadeen purchase their weapons.
Directly or not.
For the Chinese the US is the number one enemy and they will use any possible mean to destabilize her.
Just going bach to AOW's Muslim shopping list have a look at this idiot commenting here:
http://democracyfrontline.org/blog/?p=252#comment-3058
I think it is just what AOW writes about.

 
At 2/08/2006 3:44 AM, Blogger David Schantz said...

Just like the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto the 20 points listed here are in place or they will be soon.

God Bless America, God Save The Republic.

 
At 2/08/2006 6:25 AM, Blogger beakerkin said...

Mussolini

Hold on a second China has a rather unusual system for dealing with the situation. China pays generous doweries for Muslims to marry Han ( Chinese Women) . The children are considered out casts and not Muslim and the men are branded traitors.

I wonder how many of these marriages lasted.

 
At 2/08/2006 8:48 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Jason,
Yes, We've lost ground on almost every item on the list. Of course, because of the furor over the Danish cartoons, what caught my eye a few days ago was the first point.

That list was published over three years ago. I haven't read Dr. Shorrosh's latest book. Guess that I should get a copy to see if he addresses any of the points in "The Twenty Year Plan."

 
At 2/08/2006 8:53 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Skylark,
Sometimes looking back over some old material helps to give a perspective. Some time back, a fellow blogger encouraged me to post "The Twenty Year Plan," but I didn't get around to posting the points until the cartoon jihad.

Much of what Dr. Shorrosh has spoken of applies in spades to Europe. Or should I say "Eurabia"?

And, of course, Saudi is now funding Islamic centers at both Harvard and Georgetown Universities.

Paul Sperry's book Infiltration came out well after Dr. Shorrosh's list was published.

 
At 2/08/2006 8:56 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Felis,
Later today, I'll go back to the link you gave and check the comment. Work calls!

 
At 2/08/2006 8:57 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Never underestimate China!

 
At 2/08/2006 8:59 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Jason,
One thing matters to politicians--garnering votes. If they see that large numbers of voters are uniting, those politicians will, of necessity, change their positions. Therefore, the power of letter-writing can be quite great. Thanks for reminding us not to just type in comments at blogs.

 
At 2/08/2006 8:59 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

David,
Nothing happens spontaneously in the Muslim world. This is the same principle the free world faced in the Cold War.

 
At 2/08/2006 9:02 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Beak,
Why would China pay such dowries for Muslims to marry Han? Maybe I'm being dense, but I don't follow.

 
At 2/08/2006 9:03 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
China is not standing in opposition to Iran. Right?

 
At 2/08/2006 10:17 AM, Blogger Σ. Alexander said...

China is getting an increasingly gas-guzzling economy. Also, they pursue a multi-polar world. They have some reasons for trying to penetrate their influence into Islamic nations.

On the other hand, they are afraid of ethnic insurgence in Xinjian.

 
At 2/08/2006 10:34 AM, Blogger Mark said...

Excellent blog, AOW.

We shouldn't overlook all that money they earn from "black gold" coming into the US and the rest of the West to buy up our businesses. That way, they will turn themselves into our masters, and us into their slaves. Never forget: He who pays the piper calls the tune!

Why do once proud nations like the US and the UK stoop so low as to prostitute themselves like this? We are fools to ourselves!

 
At 2/08/2006 11:59 AM, Blogger John Sobieski said...

Jason, you make a good point. Everyone should have the email address of their Senators and their district Representative in their address list. And everyone, everyweek, should send a brief email to their congressman about some subject, immigration, free speech, muslim infiltration of education, urge them to study islam, taqiyya, jihad (Bostom's Legacy of Jihad) - hundreds of subjects.

It is an easy and important task. Email your congressman today. Go look up your Senator's or Rep's website and find out how you can talk to your Congressman! The Muslims are doing it to blind your Congressman, help prevent that.

 
At 2/08/2006 2:33 PM, Blogger Jason Pappas said...

Yes, we need to write. If one thinks realistically, no one letter changes the opinion of a politician. But a simple letter (perhaps by e-mail) with a clear paragraph or two, adds to the pressure of public opinion. As I say, they may not agree but they might decide to skip on this issue; and that's better than taking the Islamic side. Besides, we have to start with a few people. And we have to counter balance CAIR (and sympathizers that quack!)

Bush: comments@whitehouse.gov
Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
House: http://www.house.gov/writerep/

 
At 2/08/2006 2:44 PM, Blogger beakerkin said...

I have read articles that in the Uigihr province local custom of children of mixed marriage are not considered Muslim. Moreover the men are shunned by their community.
This is an apparent local custom that does not apply elsewhere.

 
At 2/08/2006 5:31 PM, Blogger (((Thought Criminal))) said...

But when Chinese citizens start being converted or murdered in the typical Islamic fashion, China will react in ways we won't sanction (though us private citizens may applaud).

General Tso's Chicken anyone?

 
At 2/08/2006 6:40 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
Guarandamntee you, if a crazed christian shot an imam, the entire left wing of the US would claim christians were jack-booted nazi thugs.

No doubt about that, IMO.

 
At 2/08/2006 7:00 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam...

Isn't that some of what's happening with the cartoon furor? Trying to squelch freedom of speech/press?

The calls have come to cut off the hands of the cartoons and to behead those who insult Islam. Remember Salman Rushdie? Theo van Gogh?

I don't see anyone calling for the execution of Middle Eastern newspaper-editors who publish anti-Semitic cartoons.

Not a peep is raised over the murder of the catholic priest 3 days ago in Turkey where the murder screamed at the top of his lungs "allahu akbar!"

I heard a brief item on that, but not much. Wasn't that priest an old man?

I heard on tonight's news that some Muslims are objecting to the portrayal of MTP on the U.S. Supreme Court Building because the representation shows MTP holding a sword. That picture has been there--I don't know how long. See the picture here.

 
At 2/08/2006 8:42 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Bassizzzt,
You rightly point out what CAIR is up to.

 
At 2/08/2006 10:04 PM, Blogger American Crusader said...

That's quite a list and if you look, you can see that they are implementing many of those plans.
The only problem with having 20 different steps is that most Muslims can't count much more than four or five. I guess if they use both hands and both feet though...

 
At 2/09/2006 10:37 AM, Blogger Cubed © said...

Between AOW's post and Bassizzzt's comment, you can see the points that inspired the authorship by Glen Reinsford, over at www.thereligionofpeace.com, of a novel entitled "Age of Tolerance" that is the story of what would have happened had Al Gore won instead of George Bush. Spooky,
to say the very least.

Another very interesting novel is called "Tea With Terrorists" by Craig Winn (of "Prophet of Doom fame) and Ken Power. It answers the questions "Who they are" and "Why they kill." A lot of the material in this book really happened. Last I knew, it's still available for free from Winn's site, prophetofdoom.com.

Yet a third novel, being published chapter at a time on 6thcolumnagainstjihad.com, is set in fully Islamized Europe about 100 years in the future. The author really knows Islam well.

Given the points made by AOW and Bassizzzt, these works are no exaggeration--they are just the logical extrapolation into the future, and leave no doubt about why we have to win this one.

I'm really happy to see works of fiction begin to appear. It's another form by which the general population can be reached. We need all the help we can get!

 
At 2/09/2006 1:55 PM, Blogger Esther said...

Great one, AOW. Absolutely great.

 
At 2/09/2006 2:54 PM, Blogger Mark said...

Mr. Ducky:

Taxing people as punishment? Please, you are probably talking about progressive taxation and if you can give me a reason why people shouldn't be taxed in relative proportion to the percentage of the nation's total assets that they control then go to it.

"Taxing people as punishment"? You said it! Taxation should not be a form of punishment for hard work and effort. Progressive taxation does just that: It punishes people for hard work and effort!

Mrs. Thatcher showed, nay proved, in the UK that by lowering taxation, government coffers actually filled up more quickly! Why? Because by not punishing hard work and effort, people were actually willing to work longer and harder. It appeals to man's acquisitive nature, d'you see?

The reason why peope shouldn't be taxed in relative proportion to their means is simple: It acts as a disincentive to effort.

The government of the day, be it American or British, or any other for that matter, should act responsibly, and allow people to take home as much of what they earn as possible, whilst still collecting enough taxes to fund the needs of government and its services (which those are is another question to be answered at another time) to the public.

Unfortunately, once one goes down the socialist route - and let's make no mistake about it, progressive taxation is a socialist idea (whose time has past) - one encourages a sluggish economy with sluggish growth.

The new idea, by the way, the idea of the progressive thinkers, is 'the flat tax'. It's the idea of the moment. All progressives are latching on to it. You might have heard of it. And do you know which countries are taking up this idea with vigour? The ex-communist countries of the old Soviet bloc! That should tell you something!

There for you: I've gone for it, Mr. Ducky! What have you got to say to that?

 
At 2/09/2006 7:03 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Iran Watch,
Personally I believe that our culture is much more appealing and that most Muslims would prefer living in freedom than in their repressive societies. Recent events though may show that I am overly optimistic. Maybe freedom isn't for everyone.

If living in a free society goes against one's religious teachings, to the point of jeopardizing one's eternal life, will followers of that particular religion still choose to accept the way of life of that free society?

Islam is a controlling ideology which doesn't leave much--if any--room for free will and free choice. If I recall correctly, one of the Saudi princes said after the Haj (paraphrase): "There was nothing we could have done to prevent the stampede at the Haj. It was the will of Allah."

It comes to me just now that the concept of the fatalistic will of Allah may be the root of CAIR's attack on Bill Handel, the radio commentator who joked about the stampede at the Haj. Perhaps that is why Handel's statement was so "offensive to Muslims"--his comment flies in the face of Allah's will, and to defy the will of Allah is to deny Islam.

And then there's this: some of the most vociferous and radical Muslims have been well exposed to Western society and reject the ideals therein. In fact, according to a WSJ journalist, those post-9/11 jubilant chanters of "Death to America!" were among the most educated of Muslims.

Right now, we see rioters objecting to the "blasphemy" of MTP. Are these people ignorant masses? Or are they fundamentalists who want to see anti-blasphemy laws in place throughout the world?

 
At 2/09/2006 7:08 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Cubed,
Of late, I haven't had much time to read fiction. But, as you have pointed out, fiction can effectively read a readership which would otherwise not be reached. This tradition runs deep in Western literature--for example, Dickens and his novels of social reform.

 
At 2/09/2006 7:31 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Duck,
Maybe I should hold Christians like AOW responsible for the killings by The Lord's Army in Congo in their attempt to get the ten commandments made the law of the land.

Making religious law the law of the land is what the cartoon riots are all about. In fact, shari'a law is exactly the codifying of Koranic law into civil law. And I don't see that shari'a law and democratic ideals are compatible.

At stake right now is whether or not anti-blasphemy laws should become civil law. Down what road would anti-blasphemy laws lead?

Any ideology or religion--NO MATTER WHAT IT IS--should be open to scrutiny and criticism. That's part of the application of freedom of speech as it relates to civil law.

Do I think that Christians should kill those who don't follow Christianity? Absolutely not! "Behead those who insult Christianity" would bring down cries of "Imperialism!" and "Theocracy!"--and rightly so.

I confess my ignorance as to your reference, "The Lord's Army" in the Congo.

 
At 2/09/2006 8:08 PM, Blogger Papa Ray said...

Hey,

Well, you guys can all relax, things will be good from now on.

Allah just sent down his new 10 Commandments .

They look like they might work.

Papa Ray
West Texas
USA

 
At 2/09/2006 8:50 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Papa Ray,
Thank you for that link. Now, will Muslims adopt those commandments? Nope. Not Islamic.

Big Pharoah better be careful. I detect some blasphemy in his posting.

 
At 2/09/2006 8:52 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Esther,
Long time! Thanks for finding time to stop by.

 
At 2/09/2006 8:55 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
Neither the Right nor the Left "gets it" about Islam. But I think that the Right is more likely to "get it," but some on the Right won't "get it" until the economics impacts them.

 
At 2/09/2006 9:00 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Toni,
[C]reeping agenda is the perfect term! Little by little...

In CA, the school curriculum is significantly impacted by the Council on Islamic Education (CIE); the CIE has a guide which has been used to promote the teaching of Islam in the public-school system. Among the items therein is an emphasis on not letting classes see Not Without My Daughter because that film presents Islam in a bad light. Well, the story which that movie presents is fact. Since when should facts not be taught?

The CIE Guide is available in many public libraries.

 
At 2/09/2006 11:22 PM, Blogger WomanHonorThyself said...

Sheesh I actually saw that movie..Not without my daughter eons ago..and yes it does portray the reality most wish to hide themselves from...this post is so "on spot" its almost like a prophecy.

 
At 2/10/2006 7:06 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Woman Honor Thyself,
What is interesting about that movie is the Dr. Mahmoudy was so Westerized while he was in the States, but when he and his family "visited" Iran, his family brought him back to fundamentalist teachings. His American wife, whom he previously regarded as his partner, now became his prisoner; his family in Iran persuaded him to stay in Iran. Betty Mahmoudi escaped, of course, with her daughter (He'd have let his wife go home without the child, but she refused to leave without taking her daughter).

There is a book of the same title: Not Without My Daughter. The book doesn't emphasize what some call "the clash of civilizations"; rather, it's more of a human-interest story. In the 1980's I think, the book appeared in condensed form in Ladies' Home Journal or in Readers Digest. Many public libraries have a copy of the book, and I reread it in the summer of 2004. Also, premium cable-TV channels occasionally run the film, which stars Sally Field.

I wonder how many women like Betty Mahmoudi are in Middle Eastern nations right now.

I hope that "The Twenty-Year Plan" isn't a prophecy!

 
At 2/10/2006 12:48 PM, Blogger (((Thought Criminal))) said...

Mussolini,

The picture Ducky uses is a wallet photo of Jack Kerouac. Which is a good reason to wear an NBC warfare suit when reading his posts.

 
At 2/10/2006 5:45 PM, Blogger City Troll said...

ANOTHER GREAT POST AS USUAL

 
At 2/11/2006 3:26 AM, Blogger (((Thought Criminal))) said...

I think Ducky likes the drugged-out, decadent Allen Ginsburg salad tossing glory hole Kerouac rather than the disillusioned hangover with hemorrhoids Kerouac. It's sort of a classic Elvis vs. fat Elvis thing.

 
At 2/11/2006 7:21 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
I've been wanting to ask. Why did you choose your avatar?

 
At 2/12/2006 7:04 PM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
Thanks for filling me in. Your avatar makes more sense to me now.

 
At 2/13/2006 10:35 AM, Blogger Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
Franco didn't make that mistake.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home